http://www.alart.org/contemporary-art-picasso/
Why do you think people are so reluctant to as contemporary art?
From artists began to make their own decisions, which have been rejected and make fun of the elite and the masses alike. I think it's lame in my opinion, when artists do something new or that we have seen, they are asking people to see something again. To notice something unnoticed. That makes people freak out and say that anyone could do that's a piece of shit. But 20 years later people suddenly say THIS ARTIST was a flipping genius. Rembrandt, Picasso, Pollock. The same story for all of them. So what the hell is wrong with that? " General popluation Hahha " all the love that some Thomas Kincaid Rauschenberg but a stick in the face and mourn: P
The set dragged into uncharted territory and uncharted territory rrather dragging on you! They are not used to it feels much safer classic works of art like this way you can be sure they liked it because AUTOMATIC so everyone likes em, why not join, it was established that Da Vinci was great Gogh was a man, these are commonly raised masters of the art teachers less confiirmed technique so you do not get your ball broke to em like what it really comes down to vanity in the end and apparent good taste in art peers I do not think these people are Arties true because a true artist thrives on new ideas and creations is essentially one of the many things that it defines the word "art" and new artists have to celebrate (although later rejected), but at least welcomed really are gems among the gray rocks boring and nobody well ever find them, until too late (or the person is brilliant at marketing) until it is dead … that is the sad truth of the history of art .. I do not think anyone said better than when Gogh shot himself in the chest artistic life sucks … Art is a blow for us Yesy life
Teens talk about Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, MoMA